• Home >
  • Jurisprudence Library
  • Federal Court Decision #A-64-10 - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. BOUCHER, DANCAUSE, GISELE

    JUDGMENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

    Date:
    20101014

    Docket:
    A-64-10

    Citation:
    2010 FCA 270

    Umpire's Decision:
    CUB 73829;

    CORAM :

    NADON J.A.
    TRUDEL J.A.
    MAINVILLE J.A.

    BETWEEN :

    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA,

    applicant,

    -and-

    GISÈLE BOUCHER DANCAUSE,

    respondent.

    Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on October 14, 2010.

    REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
    (Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec,
    on October 14, 2010) ;
    Rendered by

    NADON J.A.:

    [1] We are of the view that the amount of $26,451 received by the respondent was paid to her because of the severance of her employment relationship.

    [2] Furthermore, in light of the evidence, we are satisfied that there was a sufficient connection between the respondent's employment and the amount of $26,451 and, consequently, that said amount constituted earnings within the meaning of section 35 of the Employment Insurance Regulations. The respondent has not persuaded us that the amount of $26,451 represents anything other than earnings. In these circumstances, the Umpire should have intervened to correct the error of the Board of Referees.

    [3] For these reasons, the application for judicial review will be allowed, the Umpire's decision (CUB 73829) will be set aside and the matter will be referred back to the Chief Umpire or his designate for redetermination on the basis that the amount of $26,451 constitutes earnings within the meaning of section 35 of the Employment Insurance Regulations and must be allocated in accordance with subsection 36(9) of the Regulations. Without costs.



    "M. Nadon"
    J.A.

    2011-01-10